β Tips are now live β tips@peoplevsbiloxi.com
PART I
My Dear Litigation War Diary
My dear litigation war diary,
The day is December 31st, 2025. It is Wednesday.
The weather is cold. The air is humid. It brings solace. Perspective.
The undersigned looks in the mirror. On top of a badass, good-looking devil, we see our reflection. Upon further admirationβbecause why notβwe then realize:
This is the last day of this year.
And that brings perspective.
What is a year, dear reader?
Not many know, but the undersigned is an astrodynamics professional. From a first principles perspective, a year consists of one complete orbit around the Sun. One turn. 365.25 days of hurtling through the void at 67,000 miles per hour while spinning on a tilted axis. That's it. That's the science.
But culturallyβas humansβit means more.
It means a cycle. It means the end of a period. And the start of another.
It means we get to draw a line in the sand and say: that was then, this is now.
It means we reflect on what was. And decide what will be.
So the undersigned reflects.
What a year it has been.
Three federal lawsuits. Twenty-plus named defendants. A website that grew from a whisper to a roar. A protective order motion that crashed and burned in spectacular fashion. And nowβa brand new domain: peoplevsjerrycreel.com.
The undersigned wishes all of youβour dear readers, our tipsters, our fellow citizens who refuse to accept the lieβa Happy New Year. π
May 2026 bring you justice, peace, and building permits issued without retaliation.
But wait.
The undersigned must be fair.
The undersigned also wishes luck to all of us. And thereβright there, in that bucket of "all of us"βthe undersigned places the dinosaurs. π¦
Yes, Mr. Creel too. (We wish we could address him directly, but there's a protective order now. Very formal. Very compliant.)
He's going to need it.
Fun fact: Just yesterday, the undersigned drove past the Old Biloxi Cemetery on Irish Hill Drive. There, emerging from the direction of the headstones in his black Volvo surveil mobile, was Jerry Creel himself. The undersigned will admitβwe got spooked. He saw us. We saw him. His soul almost left his body. And he looks like a corpse escaping that cemetery.
Is Mr. Creel taking his vitamins? We hope so. We want him healthy so he can face the consequences of his actions. We genuinely hope he takes care of himself.
(Note: Mr. Creel now has a protective order against us. We can no longer hurt his feelings directlyβonly through this website. So we address him in the third person now. Very formal. Very legal. Very compliant.)
Stay risen, Mr. Creel. Never stop shining. Happy 2026.
(He knows what we mean.) βοΈ
See, luck is the only thing that might save Mr. Creel now. Because skill certainly hasn't. His high-level secretaries couldn't pull it off. Tim Holleman couldn't pull it off. His dispositive motion disguised as a protective order? The court saw right through it.
The undersigned has a gift for Mr. Creel. A little song. A New Year's carol, if you will.
Consider it a celebration of his spectacular failure.
He should grab a drink. He'll need it.
PART II
π΅ The Song π΅
π― GIVE ME YOUR BEST SHOT π―
An Original Satirical Ballad for Jerry Creel
(To the tune of Pat Benatar's "Hit Me With Your Best Shot")
π€ [VERSE 1]
Well you're a real tough cookie with a long history Of breaking little builders like the one in me That's okayβlet's see how you do it ποΈ Dead mayor's house, Sunday drivesβput up your dukes, let's get down to it π
π₯ [CHORUS]
Hit me with your best shot π― Come on, fucking dinosaur, hit me with your best shot π¦ You triedβyou failed with your best shot π Fire away!
π€ [VERSE 2]
You tried to gag me down in federal court βοΈ Deployed Tim Hollemanβthat's your support? π€‘ High-level secretaries tried to pull it πΌ Sneak a dispositive motionβbut you can't do it π’ The court said no, you came up short π
π₯ [CHORUS]
Hit me with your best shot π― Come on, fucking dinosaur, hit me with your best shot π¦ You triedβyou failed with your best shot π Fire away!
π€ [VERSE 3]
The only thing you got out of this? π A brand new websiteβdon't you miss! π» π www.peoplevsjerrycreel.com Two-fifty K in fees, mine: zero π° Tell me Jerry, who's the hero? π¦Έ
π CONGRATULATIONS! YOU FAILED SPECTACULARLY! π
π₯ [FINAL CHORUS]
Hit me with your best shot π― Come on, fucking dinosaur, hit me with your best shot π¦ Every shot you take ends up in court for me βοΈ Hit me with your best shotβ Rise and shine! βοΈ
PART III
The Elevator Pitch
Long story short, dear readers:
If the undersigned were to explain this in one elevator pitchβand the undersigned has been in many elevators, some metaphorical, some literal, all ascendingβhere it is:
The mediocre dinosaurs created a whole conspiracy theory.
And dear readerβif you want to witness the most repugnant spectacle on the planet, read the transcript from September 30, 2025.
Imagine this: a 70+ year old manβa seasoned attorney who has spent decades in courtroomsβmaking puppy eyes at a federal judge. Playing the victim. Trembling voice. "Your Honor, my client is being harassed."
It is beyond shameful. You feel it in your bones. And while it's not you up there groveling, while you're just reading a transcript, you still feel the second-hand embarrassment radiating off the page. It's absolutely crazy.
This is what $250,000 in taxpayer-funded legal fees buys you: a septuagenarian doing theater.
According to them, we were "harassing" the geriatric corruption mob. "Extorting" them through this website. Using "threats" and "intimidation" to... what, exactly? Get them to follow the law? Issue permits they should have issued anyway? Stop surveilling our wife on Sundays?
The horror.
They cherry-picked communications out of context. Communications about issues they aggravated. They filed for a protective order. And inside that protective order, they tried to sneak in a gag orderβa dispositive motion dressed in sheep's clothing.
And the exhibits? Oh, dear reader, the exhibits.
We know we probably pissed off the poor Magistrate who got caught in the middle of this. And he's actually a very nice person who seems to be genuinely attempting to make this work somehow. We must sayβhis job is definitely challenging.
Because our boysβand if we can't be honest here, usβare not giving each other a second of rest.
If the undersigned goes over a font size? Motion to strike. An extra page? Motion to dismiss. A typo? Emergency filing with tears. The geriatric mob will move to dismiss, strike, and cryβall at the same time. It's like watching elderly velociraptors fight over procedural scraps while a federal judge tries to maintain order.
To the Magistrate: we see you. We appreciate you. And we apologize in advance for whatever comes next.
Now, back to those exhibits.
They filed the kissing video between Peter and Jerry. π
They filed the "Rise and Shine" text messages. βοΈ
They filed all the hilarious satirical content that the clerks must have loved processing.
Here's the thing about clerks, dear reader. Let the undersigned give you the inside scoop on how it works.
The undersigned recently had the privilege of visiting the chambers of a circuit judge. We met their clerks. We saw how a judge actually worksβthe process, the rigor, the attention to detail. It was an incredible experience.
But here's what struck us most: these are mostly recent law school graduates. Top of their class. Brilliant minds who fought tooth and nail for these positions. Federal clerkships are among the most competitive, prestigious jobs a young attorney can land. We're talking cream of the crop. Future Supreme Court advocates. The best and brightest.
And these are the people who had to process Jerry Creel's AI-generated kissing video as a formal court exhibit.
And obviously, they must appreciate a kissing video between a Building Official and a City Attorney. That's something to write home about. "Mom, Dadβyou won't believe what I indexed today. A romantic AI-generated embrace between two Mississippi municipal employees. My legal career has peaked."
And the undersigned? We had to brief the Magistrate about it.
Yes, dear reader. Because they filed an emergency protective order, we had to write a formal legal briefβfiled on the federal docket, indexed for eternityβexplaining the artistic merits of an AI-generated kissing video between Jerry Creel and Peter Abide. Decided on papers. No oral argument needed. The Magistrate read about municipal romance in written form. For posterity.
This is what our tax dollars fund. This is what federal judicial resources are being spent on. Emergency motions about satirical videos.
We imagine the scene: some poor federal clerk, coffee in hand, Monday morning, opening ECF attachment 97-4 and seeing Jerry Creel's AI-generated gladiator video.
"Honey, you won't believe what came through today."
The undersigned is quite sure we pissed off a judge or two. And for that, we must offer our sincere acknowledgment.
Every person we have dealt with at the federal courtβfrom the clerks to the chambersβhas been high-level. Professional. Incredible people doing difficult work.
They will have to pardon us for the drama.
For we are a man on a mission.
On behalf of the people.
For accountability.
And accountability, dear reader, is not polite. Accountability does not ask permission. Accountability does not tiptoe around the feelings of those who abuse power.
Accountability sings songs about dinosaurs and posts them on the internet.
Speaking of which...
PART IV
π Meanwhile, in Federal Court... π
β οΈ SATIRE β’ PARODY β’ PROTECTED POLITICAL COMMENTARY β οΈ
CLERK: Your Honor, sorry to interrupt, but we just got a protective order request. Emergency filing from the City of Biloxi. Peter Abide's office.
JUDGE: Emergency order? Pull that up. Now. What's the emergency? What happened?
CLERK: [scrolling] Let me see here, Your Honor... It says... [squints] ...the Plaintiff made a satirical website.
JUDGE: A website? [notices clerk] Why are you laughing, Julie?
CLERK: [composing herself] Nothing, Your Honor. It's just... [clears throat] ...nothing.
JUDGE: Continue.
CLERK: Yes, Your Honor. And... [scrolling further] ...text messages.
JUDGE: Text messages saying what? Threats? Violence?
CLERK: [long pause] ..."Rise and shine." And... [reading] ...to give him his "f***ing report about a November 18 inspection."
JUDGE: ...
CLERK: ...
JUDGE: Rise and shine?
CLERK: Yes, Your Honor. And there's a video.
JUDGE: A video of what? Harassment? Stalking?
CLERK: [pulls up exhibit] It appears to be... an AI-generated video of the Building Official... dressed as a gladiator... Your Honor.
JUDGE: [removes glasses, pinches bridge of nose] What the h... is this? Federal court stuff? Is this really in the docket? Who filed that?
CLERK: There's also one of the City Attorney depicted as... [squints] ...a gangster, Your Honor.
JUDGE: Is anyone injured?
CLERK: No, Your Honor.
JUDGE: Is anyone in danger?
CLERK: No, Your Honor.
JUDGE: Is anyone being physically threatened?
CLERK: No, Your Honor. The Plaintiff appears to be making fun of them. Aggressively.
JUDGE: [long exhale] What exactly is the emergency here, counsel?
DEFENSE COUNSEL: Your Honor, the Plaintiff called my client a "dinosaur." And in fact... [voice quivering] ...he also called me a dinosaur.
JUDGE: ...
DEFENSE COUNSEL: Multiple times, Your Honor.
JUDGE: Is your client a dinosaur?
DEFENSE COUNSEL: [hesitates] ...No, Your Honor.
JUDGE: Then I fail to see the defamation. What else?
DEFENSE COUNSEL: He created a website called "People vs Biloxi," Your Honor. And now... [voice cracks] ...he made another one.
JUDGE: Another website?
DEFENSE COUNSEL: [trembling] PeopleVsJerryCreel.com, Your Honor.
JUDGE: [to clerk] Is this a protective order or a motion to stop someone from being mean on the internet?
CLERK: It appears to be the latter, Your Honor.
JUDGE: [sighs] Is there anything else? [to clerk] Julie, pull up the website. Let's see what we're dealing with here.
CLERK: [pulls up peoplevsbiloxi.com on screen]
JUDGE: [studying screen] ...
JUDGE: Wow. Plaintiff's got skills. That's a professional looking website.
DEFENSE COUNSEL: Your Honorβ
JUDGE: No, really. The layout is clean. The typography is solid. Is that a custom search function? [scrolling] And the articles are well-organized. This is quality work.
DEFENSE COUNSEL: [exasperated] Your Honor, the contentβ
JUDGE: The content is satire, counsel. Protected satire. But the execution? Chef's kiss. [turns back to counsel] Continue. You were saying?
DEFENSE COUNSEL: Your Honor, he also... [flips through papers] ...made a song.
JUDGE: A song.
DEFENSE COUNSEL: Yes, Your Honor. To the tune of "Hit Me With Your Best Shot."
JUDGE: [stares]
DEFENSE COUNSEL: He called my client an "HR fuckboy," Your Honor. And he wroteβ[reading from exhibit]β"Building Official by day, fuckboy by Saturday." It even rhymes, Your Honor. He put effort into this. That shows planning. Coordination. Malice.
JUDGE: And creativity.
DEFENSE COUNSEL: [stunned] ...Your Honor?
JUDGE: [raises eyebrow, still looking at website] Well, counsel... according to this article here, it says your client had intercourse on a Saturday at City Hall. Did he?
DEFENSE COUNSEL: [long pause] ...Your Honor, that's not relevant toβ
JUDGE: It's a yes or no question, counsel.
DEFENSE COUNSEL: [shuffles papers nervously] ...
JUDGE: I'll take that as a non-denial. [to clerk] Note for the record that counsel did not deny the Saturday fuckboy allegations. [scrolling website] And Julie, pull up that Jill Poll gal. Let's see her picture and how well Mr. Creel did.
CLERK: [pulls up Jill Poll profile]
JUDGE: [studying screen] ...Hm.
DEFENSE COUNSEL: Your Honor, this is highly inappropriateβ
JUDGE: Counsel, your client filed this as an exhibit. I'm simply reviewing the evidence you submitted. [turns back to screen] Continue.
DEFENSE COUNSEL: Your Honor, what my client does on weekendsβ
JUDGE: At a government building? On taxpayer property? Counsel, I'm starting to understand why someone made a website about your client.
DEFENSE COUNSEL: [sweating] Your Honor, the Plaintiff also said my client "can't rise and shine"β
JUDGE: Can he?
DEFENSE COUNSEL: [defeated] ...Your Honor, I'd like to move on.
JUDGE: I bet you would.
DEFENSE COUNSEL: And Your Honor, there's also... [clears throat] ...another video.
JUDGE: Another gladiator video?
DEFENSE COUNSEL: No, Your Honor. This one depicts... [hesitates] ...my client and Mr. Abide... kissing.
JUDGE: [leans forward] I'm sorry, what?
DEFENSE COUNSEL: Kissing, Your Honor. An AI-generated video of Mr. Creel and Mr. Abide in a... romantic embrace.
JUDGE: [to clerk] Pull that up.
CLERK: [pulls up exhibit] Exhibit 97-6, Your Honor.
[Courtroom silence as video plays]
JUDGE: [watching intently] ...
JUDGE: Plaintiff's got skills. That's very realistic.
DEFENSE COUNSEL: Your Honorβ
JUDGE: This is not real, right counsel?
DEFENSE COUNSEL: [sputtering] Of course it's not real, Your Honor!
JUDGE: You sure? Because that looks like your client.
DEFENSE COUNSEL: It's AI-generated, Your Honor! That's the point! It's impossible to tell it's not them! And people were already suspicious of their relationship before this video came out! It's hard to convince anyone it's not real now! We need to stop the Plaintiff!
JUDGE: Hmm. [squints at screen] The lighting is excellent. The emotional connection is palpable. Your client should be flattered, frankly.
DEFENSE COUNSEL: [voice cracking] Your Honor, this is harassmentβ
JUDGE: It's art, counsel. What does the Plaintiff say about this?
DEFENSE COUNSEL: [reading from filing] The Plaintiff states it is, quote, "an affectionate demonstration and portrayal of his visualization of their relationship," end quote.
JUDGE: [pauses]
JUDGE: ...That's actually kind of nice.
DEFENSE COUNSEL: Your Honorβ
JUDGE: No, really. He sees two men who work closely together, share a deep professional bond, one directs the other, the other obeys without question... and he visualized that connection as love. That's... poetic, actually.
DEFENSE COUNSEL: [mouth agape]
JUDGE: Is your client saying he doesn't have a close relationship with Mr. Abide?
DEFENSE COUNSEL: No, Your Honor, butβ
JUDGE: Because according to your own client's testimony, Mr. Abide "directed" him. Those are intimate words, counsel. "Directed." Not advised. Not suggested. Directed.
DEFENSE COUNSEL: Your Honor, this is defamatoryβ
JUDGE: Is it? Your client testified under oath that Mr. Abide controls his professional decisions. The Plaintiff simply... illustrated that dynamic. With hearts.
CLERK: [stifling laughter]
JUDGE: [to clerk] How much is the City of Biloxi spending on this?
CLERK: [checking] Approximately $250,000 in defense fees so far, Your Honor.
JUDGE: [long pause] And the Plaintiff?
CLERK: Pro se, Your Honor. Zero dollars.
JUDGE: [turns to defense counsel] Counsel, I'm going to deny this motion. And I'm going to suggestβstronglyβthat your clients spend less time reading satirical websites and more time responding to the actual federal civil rights claims pending against them.
DEFENSE COUNSEL: But Your Honor, he said my client lives in a dead mayor's houseβ
JUDGE: Does he?
DEFENSE COUNSEL: [long pause] ...
JUDGE: Denied. Next case.
β οΈ SATIRE β FICTIONAL β PROTECTED POLITICAL COMMENTARY β οΈ
The above is a satirical dramatization. See Hustler Magazine v. Falwell, 485 U.S. 46 (1988)
PART V
The Scorecard
| What They Wanted | What They Got |
|---|---|
| Gag Plaintiff from speaking at City Council | DENIED β |
| Stop the super cool AI videos everyone finds hilarious | DENIED β |
| Protective order on communications | GRANTED β (Not exactly sure what, but something I guess) |
| Silence the Plaintiff | New website launched π₯ |
| Stop the documentation | Documentation intensified π |
| Professional reputation intact | "HR fuckboy" trending π |
PART VI
π¨ But WaitβThere's More π¨
The undersigned was ready to close this article. Pop the champagne. Ring in the new year.
But then we made a mistake.
We checked the City Council agenda for January 6, 2026.
And suddenly, the champagne tasted like evidence. Again.
Dear reader, allow the undersigned to introduce you to The Deputy Clerk Shuffle.
The January 6th Resolution
On January 6, 2026, the Biloxi City Council will consider Resolution 5Cβappointing Tyra Johnson, described only as "current Biloxi police staff," as Deputy Clerk of the Municipal Court.
The contact persons listed on the agenda item are:
- Rick Weaver, Chief Administrative Officer
- Peter Abide, City Attorney
Peter Abide. The same Peter Abide currently defending the City in three consolidated federal civil rights lawsuits. The same Peter Abide whose law firm bills Biloxi approximately $566,000 annually. The same Peter Abide whose deputy clerks notarized false affidavits used to initiate criminal prosecution against a federal plaintiff.
Why is the City Attorney personally shepherding a routine clerical appointment through City Council?
Because the last pipeline got exposed. And now he needs a new one.
The Brooke Vanover Precedent
Remember Brooke Vanover? Jerry Creel's very own employee, appointed as deputy court clerk so she couldβand this is realβ"complete sworn documents for code enforcement violations"?
That's right. The Building Official wanted his own subordinate to notarize his own affidavits.
What could possibly go wrong?
The City issued Citation CC-00237 charging a federal plaintiff with IRC code violations. No sworn complaint existed.
One day after the citationβJerry Creel walked over to Brooke Vanover and swore four separate affidavits claiming the plaintiff violated "City of Biloxi Ordinance # IRC R105.1."
It is NOT a Biloxi ordinance. There is no "City of Biloxi Ordinance # IRC R105.1."
Creel charged someone with violating an ordinance that does not exist.
Vanover stamped it anyway. π¦
The undersigned has described this as a "closed loop of self-certification"βwhere the accuser's own employees validate the accuser's accusations.
Very convenient. Also very unconstitutional.
The criminal case was dismissed on September 19, 2025. But the federal exposure? That's forever.
The Broken Toys
Let's be honest here, dear reader.
We broke Creel's heart. π
We broke Creel's mind. π§
We broke Creel's confidence. π
And we broke his little court scheme. ποΈπ₯
Because let's face itβBrooke Vanover and Tara Busby apparently no longer want to commit RICO predicate acts.
Can you imagine? After all this time, after all those notarized false affidavits, after all those fabricated citations, after all those hours of loyal service to the retaliation apparatusβthey suddenly developed cold feet.
Shocking.
Perhaps they realized that "enriching Currie Johnson lawyers" and "serving as tools of retaliation against federal plaintiffs" wasn't exactly the career path they envisioned when they joined public service. Perhaps they noticed that federal court filings are permanent and that named defendants in Β§ 1983 lawsuits don't exactly get promoted to corner offices.
Or perhapsβjust perhapsβthey realized that this website exists.
So what's a desperate City Attorney to do?
He gets a cop.
Because nothing says "clean break from the past" like transferring the notarization scheme from the Building Department to the Police Department. Same function. Different badge. Fresh face with no pending federal litigationβyet.
Welcome to the rotation, Tyra.
The Loophole That Isn't
Now Peter Abide thinks he found a workaround.
Mississippi law says police officers can serve as deputy court clerks. Sure. Fine.
But here's what the statute also says:
"The clerk of the court shall attend the sittings of the court in person or by duly appointed deputies, and he shall be under the direction of the municipal judge."
β Miss. Code Β§ 21-23-11
Under the direction of the municipal judge. Not the Building Official. Not the Police Chief. Not the City Attorney. The judge.
Vanover was never under the direction of the municipal judge. She was under the direction of Jerry Creelβthe same man whose accusations she was notarizing.
Tyra Johnson would be under the direction of the Police Departmentβthe same agency whose accusations she would be processing.
The Sanitization
Here's what happened: federal litigation.
The Vanover scheme is now documented in three consolidated federal cases. The false affidavits. The non-existent ordinance. The citation-before-complaint sequence. All of it, filed in the Southern District of Mississippi, indexed on PACER, preserved for eternity.
Brooke Vanover is a named defendant facing Β§ 1983 liability.
The Building Department pipeline is radioactive. Everyone who touches it gets named in federal lawsuits.
So what does a careful attorney do?
He finds a new pipeline.
Same function. Different department. Fresh face with no litigation baggage.
The January 6, 2026 agenda item is damage control disguised as routine administration.
The RICO Implication
For those following the federal litigation, this matters.
A RICO enterprise doesn't require every participant to know the full scope of the scheme. It requires a pattern of racketeering activity and continuity.
When one node of the enterprise gets exposed, the enterprise adapts. It doesn't dissolve. It reroutes.
And now there's a documented paper trail showing the enterprise learning from federal litigation exposure and restructuring accordingly.
That's not exculpatory. That's consciousness of guilt with a strategic response.
A Note on Tyra Johnson
To be clear: Tyra Johnson has done nothing wrong. She may be an exemplary police staff member with no idea why her appointment is significant.
This article is not about her. It's about the people appointing her, the timing of that appointment, and the pattern it continues.
If Johnson is reading this: the undersigned suggests asking Peter Abide exactly what he expects you to notarize.
PART VII
The Question
Citizens of Biloxi:
When your Building Official spends taxpayer money trying to silence a satirical website instead of, say, issuing building permitsβwhose interests is he serving?
When your City Attorney files emergency motions about AI-generated kissing videos instead of settling legitimate civil rights claimsβwhose money is he burning?
When the entire apparatus of municipal government mobilizes to stop someone from calling them dinosaurs on the internetβwho are the real clowns here?
When one deputy clerk pipeline gets exposed in federal court and the City Attorney personally sponsors the creation of a new oneβwhat does that tell you?
Now you know.
PART VIII
π£ A Message to The People π£
We are giving it to them.
We are now many. Law enforcement. Ex-council members. People whose lives they destroyed. People they persecuted. Citizens who want change but have no voice. Infiltrated personnel. We have more tips than we know what to do with. The dinosaurs collected way too many enemies over the yearsβand those enemies are now talking.
For something that merely started weeks ago, this is absolutely bonkers. It shows how hungry Biloxi is for change.
We are that change, my fellow compatriots. The People.
We are receiving reliable tips that go as far as human trafficking. It's absolutely insane. All of which have been transmitted to the FBI. We won't disclose details about these allegations at this moment.
We have two Jerry Creel city hall snacks that we are currently verifying before release. Stay tuned.
People: Prepare to assemble.
We will start organizing City Council gatherings. Let's see if they will be able to ignore 100+ of us showing up to speak.
Dear City Hall: There's no easy out of this one.
"No man is more unhappy than he who never faces adversity. For he is not permitted to prove himself."
(Jerry, Peterβconsider yourselves the happiest men alive. For you shall prove yourselves in 2026.)
Rise and shine, Mr. Creel. (Third person. Compliant.)
Keep your inboxes open. We start the year hot. π₯
Happy 2026, Mr. Creel π
Happy 2026, Mr. Abide π
Happy 2026, Mr. Abide (Alt) π
π THE GRAND FINALE π
Peter & Jerry Wish You a Happy 2026 ππ
"An affectionate demonstration and portrayal of his visualization of their relationship"
AI-generated satire. Protected under Hustler v. Falwell.
And Happy New Year. π
2026 is going to be spectacular.
Legal Disclaimer
This article contains SATIRE and PARODY protected under the First Amendment. The courtroom dramatization is entirely fictional and is not intended to represent actual court proceedings.
All satirical content is protected political commentary under Hustler Magazine v. Falwell, 485 U.S. 46 (1988) and NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co., 458 U.S. 886 (1982).
The investigative portions of this article cite matters of public record, including City Council agendas, federal court filings, and Mississippi statutes.
Public officials acting in their official capacity are proper subjects of public commentary.
Related Investigations
- The Star Chamber of Biloxi β Inside the secret tribunal where due process goes to die
- Directed by the Mayor and Abide β Jerry Creel testified under oath that the City Attorney "directed" him
- Rise and Shine β The original article that started it all
- Perjury on July 10 β The false affidavits that started the criminal exposure
Documents Referenced
- ECF No. 97 β Motion for Protective Order, City of Biloxi
- ECF No. 97-4 through 97-9 β Exhibits including satirical videos and text messages
- City Council Agenda Item 5C (January 6, 2026) β Tyra Johnson appointment
- Resolution approving Brooke Vanover's appointment (October 22, 2024)
- Miss. Code Β§ 21-23-11 β Municipal Court Clerks
- Hustler Magazine v. Falwell, 485 U.S. 46 (1988)
- NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co., 458 U.S. 886 (1982)
Have Information?
If you have information about municipal corruption in Biloxi or have experienced similar treatment, we want to hear from you.
Contact: tips@peoplevsbiloxi.com
All communications are confidential.
Β© 2025 peoplevsbiloxi.com β Exposing Municipal Corruption Through Constitutionally Protected Satire
We stand with the people. Rise and shine.